Rekindled love can be a lot more than just a bout of passion and reminiscence. Research has shown that a whopping 71% believed that rekindled reunions were the most intense relationship of their lives.
When Old Romances Are Rekindled
Toilet time : A phone free zone
“The mobile phone is a bit like God – it’s omnipresent.”
A girl on the radio recently exclaimed that her mobile phone is her best friend, and she cannot live without it. Well, some others may be unable to poop without it. Do you want to guess what their favorite apps would be? Maybe it’s Toilet Time, a series of mini games to play in the bathroom; or is it Poop Analyzer, which allows you to scan your fingers to analyze the poop type?; or maybe the prank app Pee Button, which tricks someone with peeing sounds; or is it Pooductive, an app which lets one chat with strangers on the pot across the globe, which they claim aids poo-ductive ideas flow?
These are surely no exaggerations, nine out of ten people admit to having used the mobile phone in the bathroom and a not-so-surprising 43% do so regularly. Some play games, nearly 92% access social media, while few others text, mail and answer calls. 31% even stay longer in the bathroom when they use their phones. One might argue that mobile phone usage in the bathroom is hardly required, consider some very practical reasons;95% people do not wash their hands properly after using the bathroom and being absorbed in a game or on the internet would probably make them even less likely of washing, the handheld devices result in spreading germs from the bathroom at a faster rate. One in six phones has fecal bacteria and few people accidently baptize their phones, God bless you if you already did!
The toilet seat is the best seat in the house, for some a creativity cell, a decision-making hub or a quiet road to one’s inner sanctum Santorum. And it may not be necessary to entertain pinging apps when in the middle of business. Many famous celebrities, artists and scientist assert that they get their most innovative ideas while in the bathroom, the Archimedean “Eureka!”. Fewer distractions could also help bring about creativity in our thinking. Some neuroscience studies have explored how taking a shower boosts creativity. Interesting studies (1983, 2012) conducted on bathroom wall graffiti help gain creative understanding into the human mind and various evolutionary gender differences. Hence, bathroom wall graffiti and not Candy Crush, is considered more creative.
Our toilet time gives us vast opportunities to explore ourselves with deep thoughts on life, happiness, and people. A research study has linked positive self reflections and self insight with wellbeing, and implementing it in everyday life would perhaps better our mental health. Needless to say, various studies have shown the importance of “Me Time”, which is important for work and home wellbeing. This time can help us discover ourselves, what we really like to do and also boost our wellness in various spheres of life. After all, the Chamber of Secrets was through the bathroom, wasn’t it?
Many of us have busy schedules, we are constantly bombarded with information on our phones and each of us needs some time away from the phone. Various research studies on stress recovery, multi-tasking have shown the benefits of “rest periods”, the downtime our brains require. This unplugging would be best if followed as a routine and toilet time probably gives us an opportunity to practice this. Nature has designed a system for this process to unfold, probably that’s the reason why they call it the “nature’s call”!
So leave your phone behind, when visiting the loo next time!
Akshata Kulkarni
Trust and trust measurement in health care
In recent years, research around the globe has increasingly focused on trust in the context of health care. By doing so, studies have investigated trust in a variety of relationships such as those between patients and doctors, patients and emergency rooms, between different health organisations, and most interestingly, on a larger context between the public and health care systems as a whole. The interest in this research field is fuelled in light of German sociologist Niklas Luhmann’s understanding of trust being fundamental for human life. On the other hand, such investigations have gained popularity due to the belief among many researchers, that general levels of trust in health care settings have decreased, and that suspicion has raised. Shockingly, some have even called it a trust crisis in health care. Such a crisis has important implications in the health setting, since decreased levels of trust often have negative impacts on patients’ health and system functioning. For example low levels of trust undermine patient’s compliance with therapy, or negatively impact medical counselling, due to the patients’ withholding necessary personal information for their doctor. Another alarming example is that of vaccination acceptance. Specifically, due to public’s mistrust in their government which leads to decreased public cooperation, the number of vaccination refusals increase, which in turn can lead to disease outbreaks.
To investigate trust levels, different measurement tools have been developed in recent years, some of the newest examples being from Trinidad and Tobago and India. However, when reviewing measurement tools, it becomes evident, that such measurements build on different understandings of what trust is. Unfortunately, this inconsistency hampers the comparability of outcomes of different studies on a global level. This variety of definitions and understandings of trust, can be explained in many different ways, therefore leading to an important question: What could ‘trust’ mean?
It is probably safe to say that we all have a personal understanding of trust, based on our personal experiences or the chaired experiences of others. We usually encounter first trust experiences through our mother or primary care giver during childhood, and develop our personal understanding of trust when we grow older and start to interact with many other systems outside of our family environment. We learn that generally trust is built between two or more people and that it is future oriented. Specfically, this means that when we trust, we expect or do not expect something to happen in the future. Furthermore, we learn that trusting someone or something can overcome uncertainty and reduce risk, as the person/system we trust in can deal with the risk better than oneself. Also, trust might be associated with vulnerability. For example we trust a surgeon to pursue an operation successfully, or we trust a pilot and technology surrounding us, i.e. the plane, to bring us to our destination. As trust is fragile we also learn that it is easy to destroy and difficult to build up. Last, our perceptions of trust might be influenced by understanding of fairness, values and ethical behaviour. All this leads to the conclusion, as indicated by Ute Frevert (2013), that trust can have many different interpretations, is culturally shaped and that trust is often loaded with different meaning.
Turning from the literature on trust to the scientific articles on trust in health care – there is an abundance of theories and definitions on trust predominantly developed in the fields of psychology, sociology, philosophy and economics. As mentioned before, there exist a variety of definitions of trust, based on theoretical differences. For instance, according to the German sociologist, Niklas Luhmann (1968), trust can be understood in the abstract manner of being a mechanism to reduce complexity. In contrast, with respect to patient-physician relationships, trust can be viewed as a set of expectations that the physician will behave in a certain way, or as a feeling of confidence in the physician and his/her intentions. From such examples, it becomes very clear that scientific definitions of trust are as diverse as personal understandings of trust, among healthcare systems and the wider public.
Nevertheless, arguably some commonalities can be determined. First, trust is future-oriented; second, trust is linked to vulnerability (risk), in that the question of trust would not arise in a situation where there is a lack of vulnerability; third, trust is based on personal experiences (familiarity) or the experience of others; fourth, trust enables action; and fifth, trust requires communication. As these proposed commonalities are equally abstract, they allow different interpretations in different health care settings.
In conclusion, it is safe to assert that trust is a multidimensional construct, with no single, universal definition. An important implication, therefore is that in any research or measurement tool, it is extremely important to detail the underlying construct/definition of trust. This would not only enable comparability of study outcomes, but also contribute to our overall understanding of trust in general, as well as specifically, in relation to the domain of healthcare.
Felix Gille
